<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edsmiley &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com</link>
	<description>Q2hhb3RpYyBTdG9jaGFzdGljIFJhbWJsaW5ncw==</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 20:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Banking Regulations and System Oversight: Obama Seeks Bigger Banking Restrictions (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com/2010/01/21/new-banking-regulations-and-system-oversight-obama-seeks-bigger-banking-restrictions-video/</link>
		<comments>http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com/2010/01/21/new-banking-regulations-and-system-oversight-obama-seeks-bigger-banking-restrictions-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Smiley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Banking Regulations: Obama Seeks Bigger Banking Restrictions (VIDEO).
Essentially, if, instead of viewing this as a political process, you view this as a classic issue of system design, decoupling, the reasons for this return to the days of Glass Seligman are crystal clear.
Isn&#8217;t Too Big to Fail another version of single point of failure?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/21/new-banking-regulations-o_n_431514.html">New Banking Regulations: Obama Seeks Bigger Banking Restrictions (VIDEO)</a>.</p>
<p>Essentially, if, instead of viewing this as a <em>political </em>process, you view this as a classic issue of system design, <em>decoupling</em>, the reasons for this return to the days of <span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;line-height: normal;font-size: medium"><a class="spell" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;rlz=1C1CHMR_enUS332US332&amp;ei=MLRYS73vGIbIsQOSgs3GBw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CA4QBSgA&amp;q=Glass+Seligman&amp;spell=1"><em>Glass </em></a><a class="spell" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;rlz=1C1CHMR_enUS332US332&amp;ei=MLRYS73vGIbIsQOSgs3GBw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CA4QBSgA&amp;q=Glass+Seligman&amp;spell=1"><em>Seligman</em></a><em> </em></span>are crystal clear.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t <em>Too Big to Fail </em>another version of <strong>single point of failure</strong>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://edsmiley.santacruzgeeks.com/2010/01/21/new-banking-regulations-and-system-oversight-obama-seeks-bigger-banking-restrictions-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
